EKW
NYC
6
Comments
0.070
Avg Sentiment
2
Positive
2
Neutral
2
Negative
NYC
My time was half my average time for a Saturday, still thought the Naticks were out of control.
The average of the commentary seems about right; puzzle was trivia-heavy but at least somewhat clever; likely to be frustrating for some people (a little to me, too, though I couldn't go so far as to say it was Natick-y). Maybe slightly light on revelations. It was OK?
I really liked this puzzle though it seemed kind of hard. I hear the criticisms of the fill and would defend anyone who said they hated it. But let's also give thanks to what there weren't: Naticks, which (at least to me) startlingly absent, woo hoo! Let's hope this is a trend (unless you like Naticks? maybe those people exist?) I think we'd prefer keep the criticisms to things (and their attributes) and away from people (and their beliefs). Maybe the people producing the bad/good things will get the hint.
@S. Brett The bragging part could easily be fixed if people said things like "I solved this one-third faster than normal". No one knows if that means it went from 60 minutes to 40, or from 60 seconds to 40 seconds, or somewhere in between. Statements about *relative* difficulty shouldn't really offend anyone (and anyway, you can get that from xwstats if you want an average opinion, so in general the comments don't convey a lot of information).
@Steve L The commenter, rightly or wrongly, was criticizing the puzzle and clues, not the puzzle creator or clue maker. That is not personal. Criticizing the commenter is personal. None of us should make it personal.
I have to vote for "about average interest", given how strong the reactions are either way. Seemed average difficulty to me also but xwstats disagrees. Keep up the work!
All 6 comments loaded