SP

Not a fan today, so sorry. Don’t get me wrong, I love rebus puzzles, and I very much appreciate two way rebus puzzles—but there has to be some rhyme or reason to it, and the title “Swing States” and the revealer WESTERNUNION just doesn’t cut it for me, especially for a big Sunday puzzle and only four rebuses. For one thing for a two way rebus, once you get one direction it should give you a hint to the other direction, which isn’t the case here (unless you are going to run every Western state abbreviation, which I had to at MOMTOBE since I didn’t remember HBCUs). Maybe, maybe if they were bordering states it could pass, but just because they are all Western states is not enough justification. I didn’t think the themed entries—or the majority of the puzzle, for that matter—were that sparkling enough either (although I smiled at IMNOTAKIDANYMORE). The editors are usually very stingy about passing two way rebuses, I’m surprised this one got through. I did love the clue for NBAREF though!

I’m sure there will be complainers that the cleverness of the constructor doesn’t trump the enjoyment of the solver, but I thought both were true here. Again, think about this accomplishment: symmetrical, great theme entries, no other Ts in the grid—this is a masterpiece and fun to solve as well. Between Sunday and today we got two treats this week.

I’m just grateful the answer to to “Des Moines domain” wasn’t CORNBELT again!

Agree this was on the easier side, since once you get one row in a stack the rest fall pretty quickly. And the top row was a gimme for me. But c’mon folks it’s still enjoyable, and incredibly smooth fill for nine fifteen letter spanners. And in a debut? This is a tour de force and absolutely a worthy Saturday

Sigh looks like I need to repost this since the emus ate it the first time. Sorry if it posts twice. HecK I WIsh I had thought of this theme and that’s quite a compLIMEnt. It didn’t take ME LONg but I’d awarD A TEn to it. I hope it doesn’t elicit frustration nOR ANGEr in other commentators, nor inCUR RANTs. It made me delightfulLY CHEErful!

As long as we are extolling Dolly Parton, I wanted to point out as a pediatrician she is a strong reading advocate and founded the Imagination Library. I work at a community clinic and all our low income families can sign up and get free books monthly for all their kids from birth to age 5 . She really is a national treasure.

This was a really impressive debut for a number of reasons. A very charming theme that I enjoyed as a fellow lover of mythology. The revealer conveniently stacked right under the last clue. Four long extra down clues that were pretty interesting. Very little glue. I thought this was above average both in skill and solving enjoyment for a Tuesday. Well done!

I’m shocked really that so many literate folks (who are doing the New York Times crossword puzzle and presumably avid readers) have never heard the term “cozy mysteries”. That’s not a put down at all, it’s just surprising because I see signs for this all the time in bookstores and libraries not to mention book reviews. So it’s ok if you haven’t heard it, but don’t put down the puzzle saying that’s some obscure or made-up term, because it’s a very common and legitimate genre.

I thought this was a clever conceit, but a few of the theme clues felt a bit off—as well as several other clues. NOT and NAUT and FALL and FOLL are hardly homophones. On the other hand I loved TWO PARTICLE HARMONY and BOSTONPOPSICLE and “news hound” was a very artful clue. As for other clues that put me off—INMONO? You can say “in stereo” so the extra IN is really odd there. It just doesn’t work. BLACKART—has anyone ever said that not in a plural? Help me gamers—LIFEBAR? Is that really a thing? I’ve always called it a HEALTHBAR. AMNESIA for “never mind”? Just…off. There were a lot of sections especially the NW that seemed pretty ambiguous and/or Naticky and a bit forced. I don’t know what it was but I just didn’t have fun with this one even though the theme should be one I would enjoy. What did you all think?

For those who don’t see the point: First, I thought this was an interesting and pleasant puzzle even if you solved like a themeless (although I did use the Os on the six die). Second, I think there’s fun in gradually figuring out the theme—at first I was trying to rearrange letters or see if they SPELT anything. Finally I get enjoyment from appreciating the creativity and artistry and ingenuity of the constructor—I know not everyone does, but I do.

Loved this puzzle. Forgetting about the theme, it solved like a chewy themeless, with a lot of misdirects for me—ADAM before SELF, UCSD before SDSU, LINENS before DIAPER, I could go on—and good fill and clever clues. As for the theme, it’s getting scary—I saw the first one “meditation chant, in a sense” and I immediately knew this would be OM inside a sense word. But even understanding the theme, there were no gimmes with it, even with RAREEVENT because I thought it was Christopher REEVES. The theme helped but didn’t give anything away, the best of both worlds. Big thumbs up.

This wasn’t so terribly hard, exactly, although it was one of those puzzles where solving one area didn’t really help with the rest, I almost felt like I was solving 4 puzzles. And the fill was great, I just felt like many clues were just a little…off. Yes pirates lack VITAMIN C but so did all seaman, it just seems like an overly misdirection even for a Saturday. Same with whalers and their CATCH—nothing special about whales. Some KOI are gold but they can be other colors too so maybe it should have been “Some gold fish?” CERTS is certainly a breath mint not a candy. You can be guilt-RIDDEN but have you ever seen that as a word by itself not hyphenated? And lastly while I love the clue for INSULATIONS it just doesn’t seem like a real word. I can’t use it in a sentence. If I want to buy insulation for several attics, I would still buy “insulation” or at most different “types of insulation”. I got through all of them eventually, and any one by itself I would have ignored, but so many of them just seems…unsettling.

So: one Spice Girl reference is a blip. Two is a pattern. Throw in WHAM and you have a deliberate attempt at torture against the Geneva convention. Also, is it my imagination or did we just have Michael CERA and MAO clued exactly the same way in recent puzzles? Thought the editors would mix it up a bit. Finally, a funny bit of trivia, CLEAVE is a word that can mean it’s opposite. Nothing really against this puzzle by the way although it was a bit trivial proper noun heavy for a Tuesday.

I wanted to take a moment to recognize the passing of one of the great wordsmiths of this or any generation, Tom Stoppard. I found a quote of his that I believe everyone on this forum can finally agree on and appreciate: “Words... They're innocent, neutral, precise, standing for this, describing that, meaning the other, so if you look after them you can build bridges across incomprehension and chaos. But when they get their corners knocked off, they're no good any more... I don't think writers are sacred, but words are. They deserve respect. If you get the right ones in the right order, you can nudge the world a little or make a poem which children will speak for you when you're dead.” and two more of my favorites: “Life is a gamble, at terrible odds. If it were a bet you wouldn’t take it.” “Eternity is a terrible thought. I mean, where’s it going to end?” I’m just scratching the surface, I’ll let you discover more yourself if you haven’t already. Farewell, Sir Stoppard, thank you for sharing your wit, wisdom and humor with us. You will be missed.

Great debut Nate. Nice theme entries that had me guessing what the theme could be, and as a pediatrician I appreciate the NEONATALNURSE clue and the nurses themselves. That’s not a wet paint clue, we really do call them that—although to be honest they are often far too busy to do the rocking and we luckily have volunteers for that. Interesting little story, when I was a resident I would do the rounds at night in the neonatal intensive care unit. Before bed I would often sing them songs and every night would have a theme (yes Andrzej often show tunes—poor babes). I also told them that if they slept and didn’t have any issues through the night they could come to me when they were 5 and I would buy them an ice cream. No one took me up on it. Anyway, fun puzzle, fun clues. I especially enjoyed the call out to TCHALLA and Yogi BEAR who indeed must have been a cub sometime.

Like many of the other early commentators here, I am getting seriously annoyed. It takes more than a rebus and a clever theme idea to make a decent Thursday puzzle. Ok, it was a cute idea and the theme fill was relatively interesting and well chosen. And I will even grant that for some themes if you get the first one you can fill in the others more easily, that’s the nature of some themes. But for heaven’s sake why does the majority of the clueing have to be a Monday level? Seriously does three quarters of the puzzle have to be gimmes? I just finished a Saturday archive puzzle—June 4th 2016–Byron Walden/Brad Wilbur. Took me an hour and a half but I finally cracked it (except for an Natick at the end that I could have potentially cracked as well). I’m not saying it was a perfect puzzle but at least it had respect for the solver’s intelligence. And I know this is a Thursday, not a Saturday. But still—is the New York Times readership that much less intelligent than 10 years ago, or do the editors just think we are? Sorry for the rant, and if you want to go off on me for being an elitist have at it. But the juxtaposition of solving these two puzzles just really set me off.

Didn’t finish the puzzle yet but wanted to be the first to say it—who wanted Wayne’s World to be BATCAVE or GOTHAMCITY?

I don’t usually have much to say about Monday puzzles but I think this was about as interesting and entertaining a Monday in recent memory. I enjoyed it a lot.

Thumbs up to this puzzle overall, especially for all the fresh interesting long entries. I loved the central crossers, love the phrase LIKEABOSS, love the clue for SOLOCAREER, and love the trivia fact cluing SILKMOTH. Admittedly there was some inconsistent areas in terms of difficulty and some fill that may irritate some people—is TNIA Miller going to be the next celebrity we have to memorize for their crossword friendly name along with ESAI and NIA and AYO and ISSA? Calling the Brady family an ENNEAD seems like calling the three STOOGES a triumvirate (and what about Tiger and Cousin Oliver?) Between that, the unknown FLOG to me and going back and forth between GERM and SEED I definitely had some pause in the north and middle east. Still it was more than made up for by OLDIESBUTGOODIES like GARBO and OVALTINE and great clues for GURNEY, MOSS and GYM. So kudos from me.

Lovely tribute to Mel Blanc. Well done.

Fun theme but I have to ask does the constructor (or the editors) fly first class? Because I can’t remember the last time I ever saw a footrest in the main cabin.

Wow did anyone tell Sam this wasn’t a Saturday? Loved all the theme entries but given the double stack and therefore the preponderance of some more obscure entries, the cluing could have been kinder for a Sunday— I’m looking at you COLMAN/MSG for example. Had to sweat all the way through this. ULTIMATELY I enjoyed it though.

Hmmm… I’m of two minds about this puzzle. First of all, anyone who was complaining of yesterday being chewy for a Monday is really not going to be happy today. Frankly I was feeling like I was doing an end of week puzzle with the top middle and right—PROGROCK just isn’t in my vocabulary, or BRAH though I’ve seen it once or twice, I had SATINS instead of SHEENS; and for some reason PAVES and GEEKY just didn’t come to my mind initially. And appreciate the hint on NEYO but I was going for NEEO or NEOO and the theme entry wasn’t coming to me for a cross. (I’m not opposed to rappers but I’m never going to get them without crosses). A lot of other crunchy entrees elsewhere like ASCII and UMHI and RAISINET and AKIRA crossing… Then there’s the theme, which really has me on the fence. I love the idea and the theme entries were very clever. But somehow the revealer just wasn’t clear to me. Probably just me, but I kept thinking the ENDS were involved some other way. Or we were splitting the book, or maybe the B and K of the book were involved (especially with BAG CHECK). I haven’t felt so dense about a theme in a long time. Finally it all clicked. And it really was a very clever theme. And I do like a challenge, Tuesday or not. It just felt very forced, for reasons I can’t quite put my finger on . Curious to see if others felt this way, or this was just one of those days my brain was just on a completely different wavelength than the constructor. Maybe I just need an EGOMASSAGE.

I enjoyed how this puzzle theme just gradually crept up on me. I really haven’t heard of CONGEE so it took NIHAO and HELLO to cement it. I thought it was interesting how OSAKAN was in the middle of the Pacific Ocean just as they are between China and America geographically. I also appreciated the shout-outs for MAHJONG (my late mother’s favorite game) and BRIDGE (my late grandmother’s favorite game). It brings back fond memories watching both of the them play (although beer doesn’t seem to be the drink of choice for bridge, does it?) Wondering, if Lee had OATMEAL, Cheerios, Chex and Raisin Bran for breakfast would those be cereal commas?

One more misdirect I had briefly—anyone else put ARI before RIO Grande? Guess I’ve been watching too much Wicked.

I’m going to try and scoop Mike for a change: Did you study for the test on Icarus? No, I’m gonna wing it.

Interesting that the clue for Pluto could be GOD or DOG…Despite my interest in mythology I had the latter first

I have a strong opinion that if you are going to use anagrams in a crossword puzzle, there has to be a point to it (besides a cute revealer). This was a great example of it done well. The theme was funny and brilliant and clever, and the rest of the grid had a lot of lively answers also. And of course two Star Wars references, one Star Trek, one Harry Potter and Fantasia all tickle my fancy (your mileage may vary). Top marks from me.

SHEESH! Themes don’t get any tighter than this, between the grid art, 7 phi rebuses, and 7 symmetric phrases with a double I/O phrase at the beginning (and PHI as an entry itself). That’s all a feat ONTO itself, and I would have forgiven some clunky fill as a result, but it was all pretty smoothly done save for the occasional ETHENE or OBELI, nothing too untoward. I enjoyed both the fill and the solve quite a bit. The real kicker? I had an error I had to flyspeck at the end. I had POSH instead of PISH. And in the worlds of Mary Poppins: Oh, PISH-POSH! <a href="https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8ozZiXIko9s" target="_blank">https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8ozZiXIko9s</a>

Some easy spots but some harder ones, and a lot of very clever clues—CREASED, SPEEDGUN, HATEWATCJ, OEUVRE, DELETEDSCENES, HELDSERVE all stellar in my opinion. I enjoyed it!

I didn’t hate it, but count me in the less than enthused crowd. It’s not that I’m opposed to the occasional themeless Sunday, but if that’s the case I’d really like to see more clever, interesting fill instead of straight trivia and obscure entries. I don’t even care so much for the marquee entry in the middle. I had Gauss before gamma, and thought there might be a theme because I was trying to fit Johnny Cash in and Dura mater for the outer layer of the brain (even before I got to pia mater, coincidentally—dura mater IS the actual outer layer of the brain). I knew pia mater and Naked Sun but can see why those annoyed people. I also had Erie before Arie, but in retrospect that you might figure out, since Maeve is an Irish name and the Ohara’s who owned Tara in GWTW were Irish. Finally, maybe let’s agree that themeless puzzles on Sunday should just have the title “Themeless puzzle” because I agree Power Grid was an intriguing title but had nothing to do with anything.

Wow I guess I’m in the minority today. I thought the theme was brilliantly constructed and the fill was good, I just thought the clueing was too easy. I didn’t give hardly anything a passing glance until the middle bottom, and that’s only because I forgot the Wizards were NBA not NHL and was looking for TUNE or TONE before TONYAWARD (terrific clue that). My only real nit was Stadia for Stadiums in the clue (made me think it would be something archaic, seriously who says stadia today?) and I didn’t mind I BEEN HAD but think it should have been signaled by something else non grammatical (They done got me! was my suggestion in an earlier post). I guess I got ALIBABA early on and was off to the races, but based on others’ reactions I was just on the constructor’s wavelength. But I have loads of appreciation for today’s puzzle.

If I wasn’t clear in my earlier post, I WILL OWe you an apology, I hoPE A Repost will help. This was far froM A PLEasure cruise to solve but I have neither bitterness nOR ANGEr about the difficulty—it was sO LIVEly and and its artistry made me want to clAP—PLEnty of clever, misdirecting clues that were sure to curB ANY ANimosity I might have felt. I only have epic LOVE for this puzzle. If you disagree, I won’t use any fanCY PRESSure tactics to change your mind but I can’t get enough of puzzles like this, I guess I’m just an enigMA HOG—ANYone agree?

So as weird coincidences go this is one of the weirdest. My boss at Cincinnati Children’s hospital is Dr. Andy Spooner. (Not such a common name, right?) He loves crosswords, is very good at them, knows I’ve published (I’ve challenged him with all my rejects) and has mentioned to me that he’s toyed with writing them. So I see this byline and immediately text him —congratulations, that’s amazing, why didn’t you tell me? I finish the puzzle and read the constructor notes and who would believe it, it’s a DIFFERENT Andrew Spooner (my boss is definitely not Australian). How crazy is this!!! In any case as I’m doing the puzzle, I’m thinking, well I definitely won’t say anything bad about it—luckily, boss or not, I don’t have to. This is an exceptional puzzle and even more exceptional debut. Love the long crossers and the clues (SPOONRACE is certainly perfect for this constructor). Lots of clever clues, loved the STROLLER clue (and I had TEENS before NANAS for the other babysitting clue) and CELLMATE. I’m sure I won’t be the only one to have BRA for “Broad band” although I was a bit surprised the NYT would allow a somewhat pejorative term for women. Also loved the GEODE and “marked with an X” clues. Overall a nice difficulty level for me and appropriate for a Friday. So congrats Mr. Spooner, whoever you are, for an enchanting debut. I’m headed to bed as soon as I pick up my jaw off the floor.

Well I suspect as we’ve seen already, YMMV depending on whether you like, or at least are familiar with, the show. But whatever you think, you have to give credit for some fabulous construction here—with a lot of gratitude to the crossword gods, no doubt. You have 6 random names from a show and somehow manage to get them completely symmetrical (from side to side at least) and the benefits crossing them? With the exception of Rachel they can be clued as something other than a first name? AND you get the perfect title and revealer??? (I think the name of their cafe was obscure enough that it doesn’t ruin it for most people, and as the editors said regardless you can’t NOT use it.) This is just too good to be true. You can nit all you want about the rest—Ok the grid was a little ungainly with a lot of closed areas, which made it on the harder side to solve, even once you got the theme—but this is a really impressive achievement and nothing to sneeze at. I enjoyed it a lot!!! Also, shout out to my daughter in law and her family who are from Chandler.