Chris
UK
UK
I have opinions on this and none of them are good sadly, which is a shame as I don't like to be overly critical of constructors let alone new ones. My main problem is alot of the cluing is just not up to scratch; or it's overly obtuse for an early week puzzle. And this is something that I feel the editors should have stepped in on and offered suggestions if this was the day of the week the constructor was aiming for. Which ultimately led to this feeling like more of a slog than being fun. I would list particular clues but there were alot and I don't want to make this post an essay. This is me venting my opinion more than anything and if you found enjoyment in this where I sadly didn't, please dont take this too personally.
While I appreciate the theme to a certain extent, the fill around it was god awful.
@Jim the thing is that the NYT crossword is very happy to accept payment from international customers to access the puzzle (remember its not free like the mini or connections), so complaining about people complaining it's american specific is asinine as alot of the complainers pay and have a right to voice what they like and what they dont. Personally I don't mind the Americanisms and put up with it because as you say, it's an American publication. But todays was extreme in that regard, but tomorrow's another day and the odds are that whatever they put out will be a big improvement over whatever the hell this was
This just felt like a chore to me. Admittedly the theme was clever but the whole thing was hard work and not in a fun way
While I thought the puzzle was ok, and although I figured out there were shenanigans going on with rebuses early on in the fill. I feel this puzzle could have used a revealler to tie it all together
Daniel should have stayed away, this was dreadful for a Monday
@Phil This term does pop up on Crosswords fairly often so it's one to remember. Basically it's a title of respect when addressing speaking to an Indian, like how we would use sir. <a href="https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sri" target="_blank">https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sri</a>
@Kelsey Like you I've been solving for a few years too, but I've done worse puzzles than this (but not many), remember the Robert Frost "poem" from a Thursday a couple of years ago? That one still ranks as my worst and it will take some effort to topple it
@Peabody while I dont like non description sounds in puzzles, I still have an irrational hatred for "playground retort" which irks me more
@Marshall Walthew although one Newcastle is much bigger than the other (Newcastle upon Tyne is one of the biggest cities in the UK with a relatively well known Premiership team). There is an easy way to seperate the two, If this ever comes up again which is very unlikely; it's Newcastle UPON Tyne and Newcastle UNDER Lyme. This may help or not but wanted to put it out there all the same
@MDB The commenter really don't like criticism on the blog, every puzzle is fantastic and brilliant and won't be told otherwise.
@Wayne I wouldn't worry about it, the commenters usually praise all puzzles with the odd exception which is fair enough if that's what you want. On r/Crossword it's getting panned with most votes skewing towards poor/terrible as they tend to be more critical over there. I like to read both sections to try and balance out my opinions and biases.
There was some clever Wordplay in this, but too many of the clues made me groan when I got the answer so this wasn't my favourite sadly.
@a believe it or not my issue is not with the challenge and I just thought the cluing wasn't necessarily a Tuesday level. Be snarky all you want but times have changed old man, so maybe you should get with the times instead of being sour 😘
@UE I went back to have a look and while it's not entirely obvious; I think you may be right about it being a revealer, albeit a 'stealthy' one.
@john ezra I've added my vote to this, but I have to say the inclusion of the Robert Frost and Art Heist puzzles in puzzle of the year is a controversial one
@Paul while I get that some people will hate this for being too hard, for me it wasn't the case. I do like a good hard puzzle on occasion, only when its well executed. This can be measured by how many "o's" a good hard clue will have. To elaborate when you get a hard clue after getting enough from the info available I.e crosses, a good answer will make you go oooooooooooh and feel satisfying to get after the work it took to decipher. A bad clue is the same but you go "oh" instead, which means the juice was not worth the squeeze. Today for me there were too many "oh's" and not many if any ooooooh's. I really hope this makes sense.
I'm sure this is an oversight and not maliciously greedy (although you never know these days), but I shared the link to the "how to solve the NYT crossword" article to a friend who has a games subscription (like me), and its paywalled behind a full subscription. Can the NYT confirm this is the intent and if not could it be fixed? Like I say probably an oversight but would not be surprised if this was deliberate
All 18 comments loaded