Gavin

Sydney

15
Comments
0.456
Avg Sentiment
8
Positive
5
Neutral
2
Negative
Sort by:
GavinSydneyFeb 24, 2026, 3:37 AM2026-02-24positive95%

Top job, Mr Aaronsen. I didn’t realise the explicit EG theme, so you got me, and I enjoyed the solve. The number of incorrect first instincts was impressive, and I liked the subtle near double-ups, like LEVEE and LEVIES, and EVE and VEE side by side. Great Tuesday fare.

35 recommendations
GavinSydneyFeb 10, 2026, 3:47 AM2026-02-10neutral79%

@Steve L If [Bird] can be an accurate clue for EAGLE, then [Formerly known as] can be an accurate clue for NEE. “Bird” is a more general term than “Eagle”, and “formerly known as” is a more general term than “nee”. The link between clue and answer is never a two-way guarantee of equivalence.

12 recommendations
GavinSydneyJan 22, 2026, 12:28 PM2026-01-22positive82%

@Gilead Kutnick They were instant write-ins for me. (My total solve time was about 45 minutes, though, so I’m not bragging.)

6 recommendations
GavinSydneyFeb 8, 2026, 3:07 AM2026-02-08positive93%

Thanks for the puzzle, Chloe. Easy for some, it seems, but just about right for me.

6 recommendations
GavinSydneyJan 18, 2026, 12:56 PM2026-01-18neutral59%

@Danielle SOUNDSLIKE… is the revealer. There’s not supposed to be wordplay there.

5 recommendations
GavinSydneyFeb 19, 2026, 10:33 AM2026-02-19positive58%

@MC in SJ I’ve been doing these about a year now, and I’ve only just started even looking at Fridays, and only occasionally attempt a Saturday. And that’s fine. Gotta have something to grow into.

5 recommendations
GavinSydneyFeb 12, 2026, 10:26 PM2026-02-12neutral77%

@Dan Collins You add (“give”) an O to get the proper answer, and you remove (“steal”) an X to get the proper answer.

4 recommendations
GavinSydneyFeb 12, 2026, 10:25 PM2026-02-12positive98%

Fabulous work. Thank you Kareem!

3 recommendations
GavinSydneyJan 18, 2026, 12:58 PM2026-01-18neutral86%

@Patrick J. Not only that, but words, or in this case, “words” can have many meanings. That you can use it differently doesn’t invalidate it.

2 recommendations
GavinSydneyFeb 19, 2026, 12:15 AM2026-02-18positive56%

@Niall I think I know this one from Futurama (an excellent cartoon), and got the correct spelling. The correct answer didn't come to me straight away, though. I needed one of the crossing letters.

2 recommendations
GavinSydneyFeb 12, 2026, 10:31 PM2026-02-12positive56%

@Heidi I never noticed the Easter egg, even though OXO was an easy fill for me. Thanks for mentioning it.

1 recommendations
GavinSydneyFeb 12, 2026, 10:33 PM2026-02-12neutral54%

@Edward I originally has HOSIERY instead of LADDERS, thinking I was so clever…

1 recommendations
GavinSydneyJan 12, 2026, 2:36 AM2026-01-11positive83%

@RichardZ I went and watched it. Thanks!

0 recommendations
GavinSydneyJan 16, 2026, 11:31 AM2026-01-15negative80%

@ACDMD The confidence of your assertion is entirely misplaced. Asterix in no way implies rebus.

0 recommendations
GavinSydneyJan 22, 2026, 1:49 PM2026-01-22negative40%

@SP Totally agree that the theme was a bit shallow. I’m surprised it’s getting so much acclaim. I enjoyed it, and the penny didn’t drop instantly, but when it did, that was it. No slow realisation; just get on with the rest of the puzzle.

0 recommendations

All 15 comments loaded