Joseph

Los Angeles

56
Comments
-0.207
Avg Sentiment
19
Positive
5
Neutral
32
Negative
Sort by:
JosephLos AngelesJan 15, 2026, 9:12 AM2026-01-15positive76%

The IRENE/CDS/NOTE/ROD/DYNE cluster was pretty sticky but the rest I quite enjoyed

173 recommendations6 replies
JosephLos AngelesOct 5, 2025, 8:56 AM2025-10-05negative78%

Enjoyed the theme at first but soured by the end with some dicey cluing and phrases in the theme entries. GOODYCOPY was particularly unsatisfying.

64 recommendations1 replies
JosephLos AngelesJan 23, 2026, 7:08 PM2026-01-23negative47%

Don't tell me how to look at my sundae

38 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesApr 16, 2025, 9:47 AM2025-04-16negative95%

This puzzle was wretched and PTUI is the single most forced entry I've ever encountered. And that's not even the clue I gave up on. So many nouns and naticks, just a slog

22 recommendations1 replies
JosephLos AngelesFeb 22, 2025, 5:25 AM2025-02-22negative74%

Just enough names, nouns, and specific knowledge to spoil some otherwise fun clues. SRO crossing NAIRAS was my eventual downfall. And even as a marine biologist I've never ever heard of a GAM. Bit of a shrug on this one

12 recommendations12 replies
JosephLos AngelesFeb 1, 2026, 7:54 PM2026-02-01negative85%

Theme was clever but didn't like the phonetic tricks needed to make some work. Hard enough with North American proper nouns, an even higher barrier to need the accent to make the solves make sense. A few too many trivia on top. Not the worst, not the best.

10 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesMay 16, 2025, 8:49 PM2025-05-16negative90%

TREY, SHAG, CUBER were the standout bummers but me and this puzzle just weren't on the same page. Also, NERD ALERT isn't really sarcastic.. just kinda rude

9 recommendations1 replies
JosephLos AngelesApr 9, 2025, 10:05 AM2025-04-09positive99%

Wonderful puzzle, very nicely done. Favorite fill in recent memory and the theme was excellent! Five stars

8 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesJul 13, 2025, 9:08 AM2025-07-13positive95%

Fun solve although I didn't get the theme until it was over. Love a bit of sperm whale trivia!

8 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesOct 2, 2025, 9:42 AM2025-10-02positive53%

Didn't love KALE for moolah, bit of a stretch. But otherwise quite fun. And Go Dodgers

8 recommendations2 replies
JosephLos AngelesNov 23, 2025, 9:28 AM2025-11-23negative84%

Weak theme, mostly inoffensive cluing but just never really got on the puzzle's wavelength. Onwards!

8 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesDec 17, 2025, 7:04 PM2025-12-17negative90%

Weak theme with some sketchy cluing. QUEST was probably my least favorite, centerpiece was an odd descriptor. Onwards

8 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesJun 8, 2025, 8:07 PM2025-06-08positive93%

Too cute by half. This one needed more time in the oven from the theme to the cluing

7 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesOct 31, 2025, 9:10 PM2025-10-31positive96%

Interesting to see some differing opinions, but this was my smoothest Friday in a while. Enjoyed it!

7 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesNov 19, 2025, 6:45 PM2025-11-19negative84%

Pretty breezy and mostly fun, but KAYO and DUNZO are gross. Also MINOR TEAM makes sense in context but isn't really a phrase. Bit forced overall

7 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesNov 28, 2025, 9:55 AM2025-11-28positive98%

Enjoyed this one, decent crunch but flowed well and no obvious clunkers for clues. More of these please!

7 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesNov 22, 2025, 8:27 PM2025-11-22negative70%

So many proper nouns... Mostly fair but the end was a slog. Also take issue with the FORCE CHOKE clue, the force isn't strictly telekinetic and the choke isn't always used for intimidation. Easy enough in context but bit of a stretch

6 recommendations1 replies
JosephLos AngelesDec 21, 2025, 9:26 AM2025-12-21positive63%

Theme was begrudgingly fun, even coming from someone who is pretty grinchy about Christmas being everywhere all the time. Just means I can pass my annoyance onto the unreal number of proper nouns and naticks.

6 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesFeb 6, 2026, 4:46 AM2026-02-06positive69%

Pretty breezy for a Friday. Mostly enjoyed the fill, OENOPHILIA crossed with GINSLING was gross though

6 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesJan 12, 2025, 7:39 PM2025-01-12negative90%

I'm perhaps being over sensitive, but I found the two fire themed clues/answers (for SINGED and FAINT), especially next to INRUINS in somewhat poor taste today. Sending thoughts to any solvers in LA

5 recommendations5 replies
JosephLos AngelesApr 10, 2025, 8:06 PM2025-04-10positive67%

A few dicey clues, but mostly redeemed by a fun theme and enough low hanging fruit to guess the proper nouns I didn't know.

5 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesMay 29, 2025, 8:05 PM2025-05-29positive80%

Pretty mellow theme for a Thursday, middling fill. Mostly inoffensive but AMSCRAY especially earned an eye roll

5 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesMay 31, 2025, 9:38 PM2025-05-31positive91%

Crunchy but satisfying, with mostly guessable crosses. Almost snagged on scarfing vs. SNARFING crossed with ARNIE but got there in the end.

5 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesJun 15, 2025, 10:41 AM2025-06-15negative64%

Meh. Think there was more juice to squeeze from the theme, didn't end up needing one half of the theme clues most of the time so kind of felt like a bit of wasted potential. Some iffy cluing in there too and I'm not even talking about AHNOLD, which I originally bumped on but think is ultimately fair game. Also - nobody says sea crab. Simply not a phrase

5 recommendations2 replies
JosephLos AngelesJun 27, 2025, 7:58 PM2025-06-27positive98%

Great fill, got lucky on the long crosses. Very flowy, maybe soft for a Friday but I'll take it! Enjoyed this one

5 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesJul 13, 2025, 8:46 AM2025-07-12negative94%

What an absolute slog. Can hardly remember a puzzle with so many obscura. Simply not a good time

5 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesSep 6, 2025, 9:39 PM2025-09-06negative92%

Some really forced clueing on this one, especially the "punny" entries (AMNESIACS, OPEN MARRIAGES). Not a huge fan

5 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesNov 29, 2025, 10:11 PM2025-11-29neutral42%

Tough but fair! Second in as many days. Take notes constructors and editors, more like these

5 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesDec 4, 2025, 10:41 PM2025-12-04negative92%

Really weak theme for a Thursday, more of a Wednesday IMO. Bit of an unsatisfying fill

5 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesJan 25, 2026, 4:20 AM2026-01-24negative92%

Avengers Endgame cluing was terrible, I'm a big MCU fan and even I barely followed the logic. Needed some nod to the specific saga. Don't understand WONT either. Otherwise fine?

5 recommendations1 replies
JosephLos AngelesFeb 5, 2026, 9:30 AM2026-02-05negative65%

Not for me, paper thin theme and some iffy clues. Was a miracle that GUN LAP was the right guess, would have given up if not to avoid running the alphabet on all the proper noun/trivia crosses

5 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesNov 27, 2025, 9:57 AM2025-11-27negative78%

Cool theme but undercooked. So many puzzles recently where the solve leads to some clues reading nonsensically. Makes them ugly and unsatisfying. Rest of the fill was pretty breezy for a Thursday

4 recommendations2 replies
JosephLos AngelesDec 18, 2025, 5:07 AM2025-12-18negative95%

XES OUT just looks gross and is never satisfying and should be banned from crosswordese. Not the worst Thursday by any stretch but also not the best

4 recommendations1 replies
JosephLos AngelesJan 16, 2026, 7:28 PM2026-01-16positive55%

Tough but mostly fair. The fun of BABY SHOWER and FAKE PLANTS made up for some of the grind

4 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesFeb 12, 2026, 6:44 PM2026-02-12positive97%

Best theme execution in while, screamed through most of the fill but hit a mental block in the northeast corner. Gritted through to steal the gold star! Nicely done

4 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesFeb 21, 2026, 10:00 AM2026-02-21negative89%

Second puzzle in a row where the clues were either easy or just kind of off. Lots of ? style clues where the solution isn't a good misdirect, just an odd turn of phrase. Wasn't the worst, but didn't find a lot to love here either

4 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesJan 2, 2025, 9:30 AM2025-01-02negative45%

@NMarie Wow, agree about the actor! That's an oversight. And here I was looking to see if anyone else bounced off LOCHTE..

3 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesOct 19, 2025, 10:12 AM2025-10-18negative65%

It's spelled Māori, with the macron. And the moko (face tattoos) don't necessarily indicate "rank". Reducing a cultural touchstone to "facetats" feels off, especially coming from a US institution where face tattoos have a completely different association, often negative. Also this puzzle was truly terrible. But I'm more fired up about the first thing

3 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesDec 3, 2025, 5:46 AM2025-12-03negative77%

As a massive star wars fan I'm bummed this puzzle wasn't a more satisfying fill, Egyptian sun god and PRELL probably being my two least favorite. Undercooked, this puzzle was, hmmmm?

3 recommendations2 replies
JosephLos AngelesJan 22, 2026, 10:03 AM2026-01-22neutral60%

Woof

3 recommendations3 replies
JosephLos AngelesFeb 8, 2026, 9:55 AM2026-02-08positive99%

Delightful and breezy. Favorite Sunday in a while

3 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesFeb 8, 2026, 5:50 AM2026-02-07positive49%

Tough one! Fell into place after a really sparse first pass in a way that was mostly satisfying except for a pair of noun-crossed alphabet runs. Here as a scientist to say that GENUS AND SPECIES is a pretty dubious fill for that clue though, not incorrect just not a phrase used often in the field.

2 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesFeb 13, 2026, 7:32 PM2026-02-13positive91%

FLAT EARTHERS and MINNESOTA NICE were delightful, kind of came apart at the seams with some dicey obscura. Settled out to a better than average (but not excellent) hard Friday

2 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesFeb 23, 2026, 12:05 AM2026-02-22neutral44%

Some dodgy clueing left a bit of a sour taste (CAREER, IRED, ONEL, LOCATE) but the theme salvaged this to a mostly enjoyable fill

2 recommendations1 replies
JosephLos AngelesJan 13, 2025, 6:41 AM2025-01-12neutral77%

@HeathieJ I think you're correct, but I also have to imagine NYT can (or should be able to) scan or make emergency clue changes in cases like this. Doesn't seem like a big ask

1 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesMar 3, 2025, 9:15 AM2025-03-02negative77%

As with other similar themes in the past, it should have been coded to accept the proper rebus or non-rebus answers. Just hard to know whether there's anything else missing and frustrating when you've already figured out the theme. Thought it was a pretty tough puzzle on top of that with a bit of spotty cluing. Not my favorite Sunday

1 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesOct 5, 2025, 4:35 AM2025-10-04negative86%

Two obscure names crossed with SERAPES was pretty rude. Uneven fill between the naticks and the easier than usual Saturday clues. Onward

1 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesDec 1, 2025, 9:31 AM2025-11-30negative68%

Pretty rough outing, flowed well enough but so many proper nouns. Not a disaster but not much fun either

1 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesFeb 20, 2026, 7:52 PM2026-02-20negative75%

Had me most of the way, lost me at FRIEND MATERIAL, TIMES, and SCENES. Not even hard necessarily, but cluing felt pretty loose for a Friday.

1 recommendations
JosephLos AngelesSep 27, 2025, 10:54 AM2025-09-26neutral42%

Too clever by half. Clueing was pretty iffy on this one

1 recommendations