Matt

New Haven

Comments

-0.652

Avg Sentiment

Positive

Neutral

Negative

Sort by:

MattNew HavenMar 2, 2025, 7:36 PM2025-03-02negative93%

Should've been a rebus. Far too much time wasted under that premise. Very misleading.

12 recommendations2 replies

MattNew HavenJan 9, 2025, 3:11 PM2025-01-09neutral70%

Oh, I see. We have to be fluent in Italian to finish the Thursday crossword. Cool. Fine to have one - or even two clues. But having them dependent on one another is kind of unfair?

10 recommendations4 replies

MattNew HavenApr 26, 2026, 10:45 AM2026-04-26neutral58%

Donuts are not baked...

6 recommendations5 replies

MattNew HavenJan 2, 2025, 2:30 PM2025-01-02negative92%

A good puzzle ruined by hyper-specific rebus requirements. Boo, NYT.

4 recommendations2 replies

MattNew HavenJan 6, 2026, 3:33 PM2026-01-06neutral61%

@Red Carpet, I'm all for challenges and agree with the sentiment. But also... the obscurity of some of these clues belonged later in the week. Save it, and let people have their Tuesday's in relative peace.

3 recommendations

MattNew HavenAug 8, 2024, 10:45 AM2024-08-08negative44%

Thumbs down. Rebus was fine and clever, but this was a Saturday puzzle.

1 recommendations

MattNew HavenApr 17, 2026, 11:19 AM2026-04-17negative57%

Um, am I the only one that has a problem with "LORD IT OVER"? Or am I missing something obvious?

0 recommendations5 replies

MattNew HavenApr 17, 2026, 1:15 PM2026-04-17negative68%

@Barry Ancona, I guess I am. I don’t understand the need for the “it”. What is the “it” in this phrase?

0 recommendations

All 8 comments loaded