Eric

Boston

6
Comments
0.725
Avg Sentiment
4
Positive
2
Neutral
0
Negative
Sort by:
EricBostonJul 12, 2025, 1:23 PM2025-07-12positive96%

This felt like an old-school puzzle, in a positive way. Quite difficult but not unreasonably so or Natick-y. Congratulations and thank you to Katie!

15 recommendations
EricBostonMar 23, 2024, 1:26 PM2024-03-23positive93%

Tough puzzle but I loved it. I feel like this was much closer to a traditional Saturday-level difficulty, without the fill being totally obscure or ridiculous. I think NYT puzzles have largely evolved in a good direction but I do relish having more challenging ones now and then.

14 recommendations
EricBostonJan 13, 2024, 1:47 PM2024-01-13neutral59%

@Nat K I think it's a both-and. Solvers improve, but I do feel like older puzzles (even just 10 years ago) are much more difficult, and not just because the references aren't as fresh. Feels like older puzzles were more trivia-ish, and there has been a notable effort to move away from crossword-ese over the years. I think modern puzzles are both better and easier for that shift in emphasis.

13 recommendations
EricBostonDec 21, 2024, 3:00 PM2024-12-21positive98%

Loved this. Really difficult cluing, great to see.

10 recommendations
EricBostonJan 13, 2024, 1:45 PM2024-01-13positive95%

Lovely puzzle, and I set a PR by a long way. This does feel like an example of where the NYT crossword is getting much easier. This felt like a Friday-level difficulty at most. But I also don't think better, more accessible but slightly easier puzzles is a terrible thing, to be clear.

7 recommendations
EricBostonDec 15, 2024, 12:54 AM2024-12-14neutral87%

@RozzieGrandma If there's an abbreviated state name in the answer, shouldn't there be an abbreviation in the clue? I thought that was a golden rule of crosswords

0 recommendations

All 6 comments loaded